Video Conferencing vs travel
The interest in video conferencing is on the rise as businesses look to reduce their carbon footprint as well as reduce business travel costs. The topic of video conferencing vs travel is no doubt one which crops up amongst business professionals on a daily basis.
Below is a list of benefits to video conferencing vs travel.
1. Video conferencing will reduce your carbon footprint
Being able to communicate face to face across the globe without leaving the office results in a reduction of fuel usage meaning less carbon emissions.
2. Video conferencing reduces costs
Less road, air, and train traveling means a reduction in fuel and travel costs.
3. Video conferencing saves time
The average business trip takes 3 days. A reduction in travel will save a business time which will result in increased productivity.
4. Never forget documents or loose luggage
Never worry about forgetting an important document or loosing luggage after air and train travel.
There are of course benefits to travel over video conferencing such as being able to visit multiple locations across the globe, as well as handling products if that’s what is required. However from a business perspective jet setting to multiple locations does not bring a measurable return on investment.
If a debate was to take place regarding Video Conferencing vs travel there would only be one winner as video conferencing allows you measure a significant return on investment.
